Georgia, known for its diverse landscapes from the Blue Ridge Mountains to the expansive agricultural plains, faces a variety of critical issues that require targeted developmental efforts. Recognizing these challenges, I was fortunate to work with a team of researchers to use the Delphi technique and thematic analysis to gain insights into the most pressing concerns among Georgia residents. The process, engaging with extension professionals, has categorized critical issues into five key themes, establishing the groundwork for strategic action and informed decision-making. Major Themes and Critical Issues: Investment in Youth and Adults: Strengthening education and workforce preparation is vital. Leadership development programs are essential to harness potential within the youth. Vocational programs must align more closely with market demands to re-skill and empower the workforce. Agricultural and Rural Economic Development: Agriculture remains a cornerstone of Georgia’s economy, necessitating support and innovation. Enhancements in agricultural technology and practices can boost economic development. Vocational training tailored to rural needs can bridge economic disparities. Agriculture and Food Safety Information: Public trust in agricultural information is crucial and currently needs bolstering. Enhancing awareness of agricultural innovations can drive sustainability and safety. Networks based on trust and shared values are needed to improve communication and practices. Resource Access and Availability: Issues of water usage and food insecurity are significant. Sustainable management of natural resources is crucial for long-term viability. Policies must be crafted to ensure equitable resource distribution and access. Social and Personal Economic Concerns: Financial literacy and social leadership are foundational for economic stability. The growing demographic of older adults requires planned support and services. Strengthening social networks can catalyze community and economic development. Addressing these identified issues through a focused lens of community capitals, as suggested by the Community Capitals Framework (CCF), allows for a holistic approach to problem-solving. By understanding and leveraging the various forms of capital—human, social, financial, and natural—Georgia can effectively direct its resources to foster economic growth and enhance the quality of life for its residents. This strategic alignment not only positions Georgia to better tackle current challenges but also prepares it for future opportunities, ensuring a resilient and prosperous state. I've included the full manuscript below if you would like to learn more. Please be sure to share your insights using the comments. Powell, A., Lamm, K. W., Borron, A., & Lamm, A. J. (2023). Critical issues facing Georgia residents: An application of the delphi technique and community capitals framework. Journal of Agricultural Education, 64(4), 76-95. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.v64i4.102

Water is an essential resource for all facets of human activity, whether in agriculture or in everyday non-agricultural uses. A common understanding of water's importance between these sectors is crucial because it influences management policies and public awareness. Differences in knowledge and perceptions about water issues between agricultural and natural resource (ANR) opinion leaders and the general public underscore the need for enhanced communication and education across all demographics. In this post I share the results of a research study I conducted with some amazing colleagues. Key Findings: Knowledge Gap: There is a pronounced difference in knowledge about water issues between ANR opinion leaders and the general public. For example, a significantly higher percentage of ANR leaders are familiar with specific water management policies compared to the general public. Perception of Government Support: Both groups recognize some level of government support for making environmental decisions, though ANR opinion leaders perceive this support as weaker. Educational Needs: The study highlights a need for tailored educational strategies that accommodate different levels of existing knowledge and address specific audience characteristics. Recommendations: Enhance Common Language: Simplifying the language around water-related discussions is crucial. This includes minimizing jargon until it is clear that the terms are understood by a broad audience. Targeted Educational Interventions: Agricultural educators should use various strategies to bridge the knowledge gap. These might include using anecdotes or targeted messages that are specifically adapted to the audience’s pre-existing knowledge levels. Coalition Building: Forming coalitions with similar stakeholders can enhance the reach and impact of educational efforts, improving public understanding through combined resources and credibility. The differences in perceptions and knowledge about water management highlighted in this study are not just academic concerns; they have real-world implications for how water resources are managed and perceived across different segments of the population. A more informed public can engage more effectively in discussions and make better decisions about water management, benefiting both agriculturalists and the general populace. I've included the paper below if you would like to read the full study. Please be sure to share your feedback using the comments. Lamm, K. W., Lamm, A. J., & Carter, H. S. (2015). Bridging water issue knowledge gaps between the general public and opinion leaders. Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(3), 146-161. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.03146

Effective leadership programs require a thorough understanding of audience needs, including aspects like goal orientation and motivation. This understanding is particularly crucial in food system leadership development, where resources are scarce, yet the potential impacts are significant. As leaders navigate the complexities of the agricultural sector, designing programs tailored to meet the specific needs and goals of participants is essential. By incorporating empirical insights regarding program participant goal orientation and motivation, program developers can enhance the relevance and effectiveness of leadership initiatives within the food system context. I'm excited to share the results of a study I conducted with several amazing colleagues examining the relationship between goal orientation and demographic characteristics. As a quick note, all the results are based on data collected among agricultural leadership development program participants, and should therefore only be interpreted among respondents - all participants should always be considered and treated as individuals (additional study limitations are detailed further below). Age and Goal Orientation Younger participants had more performance-prove goal orientation (PGO-P), indicating a desire to prove competence. Older individuals prioritized personal growth and mastery, showcasing higher levels of learning goal orientation. Tailoring motivational strategies based on individual needs may help to improve relevance. Organizational Level and Goal Orientation Learning goal orientation increased as individuals moved up the organizational hierarchy. Upper-level management personnel viewed failure as a learning opportunity, while non-supervisory employees exhibited a greater aversion to failure. Differences in risk tolerance and job security concerns influenced goal orientation within organizational levels. Educational Attainment and Goal Orientation Educational attainment did not exhibit a clear correlation with goal orientation. Cognitive ability and educational background may not significantly influence goal orientation within adult food system leadership development programs. Educators are urged to focus on other learner characteristics when designing motivational strategies. Geographic Region Differences in Goal Orientation Distinct goal orientation tendencies were observed across different geographic regions. Considering individual differences over broad generalizations is essential in understanding regional variations. Important Limitations to Consider Generalizability of the findings is limited and should not be misinterpreted. Consideration of effect size is important, as low effect sizes may not warrant immediate action. Educational environments, including leadership programs, and their participants are diverse and unique, requiring tailored approaches. Implications and recommendations provided should only serve as a starting point for consideration in adult food system leadership development programs. Educators are advised to assess individual dispositional tendencies and program-level results before implementing interventions. The interplay between goal orientation and demographic factors underscores the complexity of leadership development within the food system domain. By acknowledging and accommodating these differences, educators can foster a more inclusive and effective learning environment. A nuanced understanding of goal orientation can be a powerful tool in helping to develop the food system leaders of tomorrow. Please be sure to share your insights using the comments section below. I've also attached the full manuscript if you are interested in learning more. Lamm, K. W., Powell, A., & Lamm, A. J. (2020). Examining the relationship between goal orientation and individual characteristics amongst agricultural leadership development program participants. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(3), 144-163. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.03144

Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) have had a major impact on global food system practices by improving knowledge dissemination and fostering innovation in extension services. For example, when I was working in Kenya, Uganda, and Malawi I saw how mobile phones significantly improved farmers' access to market prices, weather forecasts, and agricultural techniques, leading to increased yields and better decision-making. This transformation was the purpose behind a study I conducted with several amazing collaborators to develop an empirical instrument to assess the capacity of extension networks to use ICTs effectively. By mapping out critical factors like accessibility, support, and perception, the study provides a framework for understanding how ICTs can be better integrated into agricultural networks globally. Through a scale development process, and as a follow up to previous context setting work, we identified six primary factors associated with ICT capacity in food system extension services: Integration of ICTs: Assessing how well ICTs are integrated into existing extension network operations, highlighting the need for incorporation into existing processes. ICT Accessibility: The ease with which network members can access ICT resources is critical for ensuring equitable technology distribution and use. Use and Support of ICTs: The extent to which network members use ICT tools and the level of support provided by the extension network for this use - the practical backing for technology within the network. ICT Logistics: The practical aspects of ICT deployment, including infrastructure, maintenance, and troubleshooting, underlining the logistical groundwork for effective ICT use. Promotion of ICTs: The efforts taken by extension networks to advocate for ICT use, essential for fostering an environment where technology adoption is encouraged. Perception of ICTs: Capturing the overall attitude towards ICTs within networks, which can significantly influence the willingness to adopt and integrate new technologies. These factors underscore the complex approach needed for ICT integration in food system extension networks. It involves a interconnections between accessibility, logistics, advocacy, and perceptions that can either facilitate or hinder the adoption of these essential tools. Based on the results, we recommend extension networks employ a structured top-down approach, where network leaders not only endorse but also actively integrate ICT use into extension activities, enhancing visibility and demonstrating practical benefits. Through this, extension networks can advance their communication strategies, streamline operations, and hopefully improve the impact of their outreach efforts in the global food system. I've included the full article below if you would like to learn more. Please be sure to share your insights in the comments section. Lamm, K. W., Lamm, A. J., Davis, K., Sanders, C. E., & Powell, A. (2021). Information and communication technology use capacity within extension networks: Development and preliminary validation of an empirical scale. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 28(4), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.4148/2831-5960.1001

The food animal industry is a cornerstone of global food security, providing essential nutrition to billions and underpinning the economic stability of numerous countries. It's not just a vital source of protein but also a significant contributor to livelihoods, cultural practices, and economies worldwide. Ensuring its health and efficiency is pivotal; as we saw during the COVID-19 pandemic any disruptions can ripple through the supply chain, impacting everything from farm workers to international markets and ultimately, consumer access to nutritious food. The industry's importance in balancing ecological stewardship with economic demands makes it a key focus for innovation and sustainable development practices. I'm excited to share the results of a research study I conducted with several amazing collaborators identifying and prioritizing critical issues facing the food and animal industry. Through a three round Delphi process a total of 56 critical issues facing the food and animal industry were identified. These issues were then thematically analyzed and grouped into 7 primary themes. The themes below represent the most critical issue areas identified through the process: Industry Image and Public Relations: The industry's narrative, as perceived by the public, is a foundational concern. Engaging effectively in public discourse is pivotal for shaping the industry's reputation and fostering consumer trust. Workforce Development and Pipeline: The sector's future depends on cultivating a workforce proficient in contemporary practices and technologies. Training and retaining professionals who are not only technically skilled but also deeply committed to the industry’s values and goals is crucial. Economic and Environmental Sustainability: These dual objectives stand at a crossroads. The industry's ability to remain economically viable while embracing environmental stewardship reflects a commitment to long-term sustainability. Animal and Human Health/Well-Being: The industry is tasked with ensuring the welfare of animals and the safety of food products. Adherence to rigorous health standards and effective disease prevention measures is critical to safeguarding public health and maintaining consumer confidence. Production and Distribution Efficiency: In the face of escalating global demand, refining production and distribution processes through innovative technologies and efficient management is a clear imperative. Government Regulations and Legislative Relations: Understanding and shaping the regulatory environment through informed policy engagement is essential for an industry subject to complex legal and political factors. Academic and Research Collaboration: Building robust partnerships with educational and research institutions is necessary to integrate scientific advancements into practical applications within the industry. These areas are not isolated; rather, they are interrelated components that must be addressed through a coordinated and rigorous approach. Industry leaders, policymakers, and academics alike must come together to prioritize these critical issues, ensuring the industry remains resilient and is positioned for growth in an ever-evolving global landscape. I've included the full manuscript below if you would like to learn more. Please be sure to share your thoughts in the comments section. Lamm, K. W., Randall, N. L., & Fluharty, F. L. (2021). Critical issues facing the animal and food industry: A delphi analysis. Translational Animal Science, 5(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa213

Engaging local communities is crucial for the success of Extension and outreach programs, and at the core of this engagement are gatekeepers — pivotal figures who facilitate community trust and access. Based on a research study I conducted with several amazing collaborators, we analyzed the dynamics of gatekeeping and their role in harmonizing the efforts of numerous service providers and protecting the wealth of community knowledge. However, the role of gatekeepers can also influence access to different populations within communities. Understanding gatekeepers can help fostering effective, unbiased Extension programs and research. Local Engagement: A Keystone in Extension Programs Gatekeepers preserve community knowledge and coordinate collaboration among service providers. Implementation of a pluralistic, demand-driven extension in countries like Malawi and Kenya has been bolstered by these community leaders. The Balance of Power and Bias Gatekeepers often influence participant selection, introducing potential biases. The authority of gatekeepers, especially when they have vested interests, impacts the objectivity of social science research. Proposing a New Model for Research We developed a model designed to navigate the complexities of conducting research in gatekeeper-influenced contexts. The model emphasizes understanding gatekeeper roles and potential biases, and designing research to minimize these influences. Navigating Gatekeeper Dynamics Strategies to ensure inclusive participation and minimize bias during data collection are critical. The importance of transparent communication with gatekeepers is necessary to safeguard the integrity of the research. Towards a More Robust Research Framework It is important to be purposive and thoughtful when working with gatekeepers across cultural contexts. Transparent methods help to establish integrity, credibility, and rigor within such research. The role of gatekeepers in agricultural research underscores the need for a balance between leveraging their influence and ensuring research integrity. As we work for more inclusive Extension and outreach programs, it is crucial to refine our methodologies and foster transparent relationships with these community members. I've included the full version of the manuscript if you are interested in learning more. Please share you thoughts using the comments section below. Masambuka-Kanchewa F., Lamm, K. W. & Lamm, A. J. (2020). Gate keepers in agricultural extension research: A retrospective analysis. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 27(4), 94-110.

Natural disasters disrupt our food systems and impact lives long after the event has passed. It's important to examine the human side of these events, which not only helps in addressing immediate needs but also aids in healing and growth over time. Appreciative inquiry provides a lens to view potential growth. Food system and Extension professionals play a critical role in this area helping support resilience. In this post I share findings from a study I conducted with an amazing colleague using the posttraumatic growth inventory to analyze what happened in Georgia following hurricane Michael. The Intersection of Human Resilience and Natural Disasters Understanding the impact Natural disasters disrupt supply chains and agricultural production. Long-term effects resonate with communities and individuals. It is essential to acknowledge the emotional aftermath for effective recovery. Role of Appreciative Inquiry Facilitates a positive framework for post-disaster recovery, resilience, and growth. Food system and Extension professionals can leverage this approach. The study found empirical support from the posttraumatic growth inventory. Insights on Posttraumatic Growth Significant Growth Indicators 'Relate to others' scored highly, indicating empathy development. Lower scores in 'appreciation of life' suggest differential growth across areas. Areas with Little Change Many respondents reported no 'new direction in life' or 'new opportunities'. Stability and control are key before individuals can process change. Unique Findings and Practical Application Variances in Response Females reported higher posttraumatic growth across several indices. Gender may influence how events are processed and growth is experienced. Guidance for Food System and Extension Professionals Utilize appreciative inquiry after a period of stabilization. Engage in supportive listening rather than therapeutic advice. Appreciative inquiry can help people post-disaster, suggesting a targeted approach for food system and Extension professionals aiding recovery, resilience, and growth. It emphasizes timely, methodical processes and practical support to improve food systems after disasters. Please be sure to share your thoughts using the comments below! I've included the full manuscript if you are interested in learning more. Powell, A.+, & Lamm, K. W. (2021). Examining posttraumatic growth after a natural disaster: An appreciative inquiry approach. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 28(1), 83-98.

Understanding public attitudes of critical food system issues is necessary for effective communication and decision-making in agricultural sectors. In this post I'm excited to share the results of a research study I conducted with several amazing collaborators into public attitudes toward genetically modified (GM) foods. The results indicate there are several factors, both reason-based and socially motivated which impact individual perceptions. Insights on GM Attitudes: Despite the neutral overall attitude toward GM foods, respondents displayed a willingness to share their opinions within social groups. Contrary to expectations, individuals hesitated to expose themselves to criticism, highlighting the complexity of public decision-making in agriculture. The diffusion characteristics of GM had a notable impact on perceptions, influencing individuals' attitudes and behaviors toward GM foods. Implications for Agricultural and Science Communication: These findings emphasize the need for innovative approaches in research and communication to address evolving societal dynamics. The study underscores the importance of considering perceptions, social norms, emotions, ethics, morals, and politics in agricultural decision-making processes. Further exploration of public attitudes toward GM foods can inform tailored communication strategies to bridge gaps between science and public perception. The complexities identified in public decision-making regarding agricultural and food system issues underscore the need for tailored communication strategies. Such strategies must address a diversity of factors influencing public perceptions, including social norms, emotions, ethics, morals, and politics. It's important to meet the public where they are, acknowledging individual attitudes and beliefs. Adopting innovative, collaborative, and discovery-driven approaches to research and communication can help bridge the gap between scientific solutions and public understanding, fostering informed decision-making. I've included the article below if you would like to learn more. Please be sure to share your thoughts using the comments. Lamm, A. J., Lamm, K. W., Rumble, J. N., Ellis, J. D., & Tidwell, A. (2020). Testing a model to explain how the public makes decisions about genetic modification. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 27(1), 47-63.

Extension services play a pivotal role in the food system around the world, acting as a bridge between researchers, policymakers, and farmers. These services provide essential knowledge, resources, and support to farmers, helping them adopt innovative practices, improve productivity, and address critical issues. By disseminating cutting-edge research findings, offering technical assistance, and facilitating community engagement, extension professionals contribute significantly to sustainable agriculture, rural development, and food security. Their role in empowering farmers with the latest information and skills is crucial for building resilient and thriving agricultural systems. Below I've summarized a case study manuscript I worked on with several amazing colleagues analyzing the history and evolution of the Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services (GFRAS). Through an analysis spanning eight years of annual meetings, the Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services (GFRAS) offers valuable insights into its transformative journey. Each annual gathering marked a significant phase: Emancipation (2010): GFRAS emerged from the Neuchâtel Initiative, striving to establish itself as a global institution advocating for the significance of extension in agricultural development. Consolidation (2011): Regional networks solidified, shaping the institutional landscape of extension worldwide. Positioning (2012): GFRAS focused on defining the role of advisory services within agricultural innovation systems, leading to the development of "The New Extensionist" framework. Broadening (2013): The network expanded its scope beyond the public sector, engaging producer organizations and the private sector in extension efforts. Strengthening (2014-2015): Emphasis on policy development, knowledge sharing, and capacity building reinforced GFRAS's impact across regions. Deepening (2016-2017): GFRAS delved into nontraditional topics like agripreneurship and prioritized inclusion of marginalized groups, intensifying its outreach efforts. Partnering (2018): Collaboration became paramount as GFRAS sought to extend its influence beyond the extension community, forging partnerships to address global agricultural issues. Despite notable progress, challenges persist: Resource Constraints: GFRAS's donor dependency highlights the need for a sustainable funding strategy. Stakeholder Engagement: Attracting diverse stakeholder groups like farmer organizations and the private sector remains a challenge. As extension services adapt to societal shifts, embracing a networked and integrated approach becomes imperative. I've included the original manuscript and a link to the research below if you would like to learn more. Please share your perspectives and contribute using the comments below! Davis, K., Dolly, D., Lamm, A. J., & Lamm, K. W. (2018). The future of extension: A network emergence perspective from the case of the global forum for rural advisory services. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 25(4), 40-51. https://newprairiepress.org/jiaee/vol25/iss4/3/

In the food system, leadership is vital due to the numerous external risks agriculture faces. From unpredictable weather to market fluctuations, effective leaders are essential. However, there remains a lack of tailored leadership development for food system professionals. By providing practical leadership skills for agricultural challenges, it is possible to enhance resilience and drive sustainable growth. The results below are from a study I conducted with several colleagues at the University of Florida. Study Insights: Food system opinion leaders show less optimism and risk-taking than expected. These findings challenge traditional ideas about leadership in the food system community. Knowledgeable opinion leaders tend to be more conservative in their attitudes. Improving Engagement: Customize communication strategies to match the pragmatic outlook of food system opinion leaders. Highlight lower-risk options in proposed initiatives to gain support. Craft messages that respect the cautious nature of knowledgeable opinion leaders. Improving Food System Leadership Development Programs: Include training on optimism and risk-taking in food system leadership programs. Expand the influence of food system leaders beyond industry boundaries. Offer specialized training to help leaders balance caution with effective leadership. Enhancing Future Initiatives: Adapt recruitment and program structures based on food system opinion leader characteristics - who is at the table and why? Keep researching food system opinion leader traits for better leadership programs - what programs attract what audiences? Collaborate with industry partners to implement tailored leadership initiatives - who else can help provide a unique perspective? I've included a version of the research manuscript below if you'd like to learn more. Join the conversation by sharing your thoughts and feedback in the comments below. Lamm, K. W., Lamm, A. J., & Carter, H. S. (2014). Opinion leadership development: context and audience characteristics count. Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.02091

In the diverse, interconnected, and expansive food system, conflicts are not just common; they're virtually inevitable. From agricultural production to distribution and policy-making, diverging interests and perspectives often collide, requiring leaders to be skilled in managing conflict. Effective leadership within the food system requires more than just vision and strategy; it demands an understanding of how to navigate conflicting interests, values, and goals. Mismanaged conflicts within the food system can have serious impacts across supply chains, affecting everything from production efficiency to consumer access and environmental sustainability. To address the critical issues facing the food system, leaders must have robust conflict management skills to mitigate tensions, foster collaboration, and drive meaningful change. The results below are from a study evaluating a leadership development program for emerging and established leaders in the Land Grant University System (LGUS), LEAD21. The LEAD21 program focuses on several core competencies, including conflict management. The results provide an empirical assessment of leadership development programs and the potential to improve conflict management skills among leaders in the food system. Importance of Conflict Management in Leadership Effective leadership requires conflict management skills. Leaders are increasingly expected to demonstrate proficiency in managing diverse forms of conflict. Conflict management coaching and mediation processes are very effective in addressing conflict scenarios effectively. Leaders need the skills to classify and engage in a range of conflicts including tasks, processes, status, and relationships. Empirical Insights from LEAD21 The LEAD21 program was effective in increasing conflict management competence among participants using a paired pre-test/post-test assessment. Through active engagement, self-awareness, and skill acquisition, LEAD21 participants experience a significant increase in conflict management capacity. Leadership education initiatives like LEAD21 equip leaders to navigate complex conflict scenarios more effectively. Implications for Leadership Education Integrating conflict management curriculum into agricultural leadership education programs empowers future food system leaders to address conflicts more constructively. Tailored conflict management strategies may also benefit community initiatives and empower agricultural leaders. Strengthening conflict management capacity initiatives complements change leadership education, supporting the development of adaptive leaders in the food system. Looking forward, there's a need to focus on proactive conflict management in leadership education for the food system. Exploring different curricula and approaches and expanding evaluation efforts are crucial. Equipping leaders to anticipate and manage conflicts more effectively has the potential to positively affect the food system more broadly. Please be sure to share your thoughts using the comments below! Lamm, K. W., Sapp, L. R., Lamm, A. J., & Randall, N. L. (2020). A longitudinal evaluation of conflict management capacity building efforts in higher education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(3), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.03075

Evaluation, once viewed as a mere assessment tool, has evolved into a vital process driving program success. However, traditional evaluation approaches often focus on identifying weaknesses, overlooking the celebration of strengths. In international extension education, where innovation and adaptation are paramount, an appreciative approach to evaluation can revolutionize program effectiveness and impact. New Approaches to Evaluation Recognition of the value of innovative approaches in evaluation has grown. Funders and extension professionals now explore diverse evaluation methods, challenging the conventional notion of evaluation as an external process. The shift towards appreciative inquiry emphasizes recognizing program strengths and successes, rather than solely pinpointing areas for improvement. Shifting Focus: Appreciating Success Research suggests that traditional problem-solving approaches in evaluation may not always yield optimal outcomes. Appreciative inquiry directs attention towards understanding and enhancing program effectiveness by appreciating achievements and identifying strengths. By shifting the focus to what works well, evaluators can offer recommendations that leverage existing successes, driving positive change. Application to International Extension Education In the realm of international extension education, the principles of appreciative evaluation hold significant promise. With its emphasis on stakeholder involvement and participatory processes, appreciative inquiry aligns with the collaborative ethos of extension work. By highlighting program strengths and fostering intrinsic motivation, appreciative evaluation can empower volunteers and drive program success. Unveiling Unintended Outcomes One of the key advantages of appreciative evaluation is its ability to uncover unintended outcomes and impacts. In contexts where resources are limited, this approach offers a flexible framework for identifying opportunities for additional investment and course correction. By embracing the dynamic nature of programmatic outcomes, appreciative evaluation fosters adaptability and innovation. In the pursuit of program excellence, international extension educators must embrace innovative evaluation approaches like appreciative inquiry. By celebrating successes, engaging stakeholders, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement, appreciative evaluation has the potential to elevate the impact of extension programs worldwide. Please share your thoughts using the comments below. Lamm, A. J., & Lamm, K. W. (2018). Considering an appreciative approach to international extension evaluation. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 25(4), 74-82. https://newprairiepress.org/jiaee/vol25/iss4/6/